@article {1835,
	title = {Primary Corneal Graft Failure: A National Reporting System},
	volume = {113},
	year = {1995},
	note = {[Article]; NLM Journal Code: 7706534, 830},
	month = {December},
	pages = {497},
	abstract = {Objectives: To describe a national eye banking registry and to assess the effects of donor age, cause of donor death, time from death to procurement, storage time, and distance between the points of recovery and transplantation on the reported occurrence of primary corneal graft failure. Design: We performed a retrospective case-control study to estimate the odds ratios of five donor factors for cases of primary graft failure voluntarily reported to a national registry using controls from selected eye banks. We also performed a nested case-control cohort study to compare cases of primary graft failure that occurred in both corneas from the same donor with those of nonmated corneas in which primary graft failure was reported to assess odds ratios for the same donor factors. Patients: One hundred forty-seven patients developed primary graft failure in penetrating keratoplasty transplantations performed between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1993. These cases were reported to the Adverse Reaction Registry of the Eye Bank Association of America, Washington, DC. Controls included 7240 donor corneas distributed by nine eye banks during 1992. Results: Of the 147 donor corneas that developed primary graft failure, 17 (12\%) were obtained from donors who were aged 70 years and older, 39 (27\%) came from donors who died of trauma, 13 (9\%) had a cadaver time longer than 12 hours, 10 (7\%) had a storage time longer than 7 days, and 38 (26\%) were distributed outside the eye bank{\textquoteright}s region. Compared with controls, these donor corneas were more likely to have a storage time longer than 7 days (odds ratio, 2.4; 95\% confidence limits, 1.2 and 4.6) and to come from donors aged 70 years and older (odds ratio, 2.4; 95\% confidence limits, 1.4 and 4.0). The 22 corneas (15\%) in which primary graft failure occurred in both recipients from the same donor were 8.5 times (95\% confidence limits, 1.1 and 51.5) more likely to be preserved beyond 1 week than were nonmated corneas with primary failure but were not from significantly older donors. Logistic regression analysis showed that the association between prolonged storage time and primary graft failure in mated corneas remained significant even when the analysis was controlled for other donor factors. Conclusions: No clearly defined donor or eye banking factor accounted for most cases of primary graft failure, although prolonged corneal storage and advanced donor age may increase its risk. Ophthalmologists are urged to report to their eye bank all cases of primary graft failure and other adverse events that might be attributable to donor eye tissue. (Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1497-1502) Copyright 1995 by the American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use. American Medical Association, 515 N. State St, Chicago, IL 60610.; References: 1. Medical Standards. Washington, DC: Eye Bank Association of America; 1993. 2. Wacholder S. Practical considerations in choosing between the case-cohort and nested case-control designs. Epidemiology. 1991;2:155-158. 3. Eye Banking Statistics. Washington, DC: Eye Bank Association of America; 1992. 4. Wilson SE, Kaufman HE. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;34:325-356. 5. Schwartz AE, Bourne WM. Endothelial cell loss after keratoplasty. In: Brightbill FS, ed. Corneal Surgery: Theory, Technique, and Tissue. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1993:300-305. 6. Chipman ML, Willett P, Basu PK, Wolf A. Donor eyes: a comparison of characteristics and outcomes for eye bank and local tissue. Cornea. 1989;8:62-66. 7. Chipman ML, Basu PK, Willett PJ, Cherry PM, Slomovic AR. The effects of donor age and cause of death on corneal graft survival. Acta Ophthalmol. 1990;68:537-542. 8. Buxton JN, Seedor JA, Perry HD, Eagle RC, Pecego JA. Donor failure after corneal transplantation surgery. Cornea. 1988;7:89-95. 9. Mead MD, Hyman L, Grimson R, Schein OD. Primary graft failure: a case control investigation of a purported cluster. Cornea. 1994;13:310-316. 10. Moore TE, Aronson SB. The corneal graft: a multiple variable analysis of the penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971;72:205-298. 11. Moore TE, Aronson SB. The role of surgical factors in corneal graft failure. In: Corneal Graft Failure. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1973:209-220. 12. Payne JW. New directions in eye banking. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1980;78:983-1026. 13. Stainer GA, Brightbill FS, Calkins B. A comparison of corneal storage in moist chamber and McCarey-Kaufman medium in human keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:46-49. 14. Halliday BL, Ritten SA. Effect of donor parameters on primary graft failure and the recovery of acuity after keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:7-11. 15. Chipman ML, Slomovic AS, Rootman D, Dixon WS. Changing risk for early transplant failure: data from the Ontario Corneal Recipient Registry. Can J Ophthalmol. 1993;28:254-258. 16. Stark WJ, Maumenee AE, Kenyon KR. Intermediate-term corneal storage for penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79:795-802. 17. Mascarella K, Cavanagh HD. Penetrating keratoplasty using McCarey-Kaufman preserved corneal tissue. South Med J. 1979;72:1268-1271. 18. Witmer R, Bigar F, Schimmelpfennig B, Bosshard P. Storage of corneal donor material. In: Trevor-Roper PD, ed. VIth Congress of the European Society of Ophthalmology: The Cornea in Health and Disease. London, England: Royal Society of Medicine; 1981:425-432. 19. Harbour RC, Stern GA. Variables in McCarey-Kaufman corneal storage: their effect on corneal graft success. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:136-142. 20. Bourne WM. Morphologic and functional evaluation of the endothelium of transplanted human corneas. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1983;81:403-450. 21. Bourne WM. Endothelial cell survival on transplanted human corneas preserved at 4C in 2.5\% chondroitin sulfate for one to 13 days. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;102:382-386. 22. Bigar F, Witmer R. Corneal regrafts. Dev Ophthalmol. 1987;14:117-120. 23. Witmer R. Keratoplastik in der Privatpraxis. Klin Monatsbul Augenheilkd. 1990;196:304-306. 24. Williams KA, Muehlberg SM, Wing SJ, Coster DJ, eds. The Australian Corneal Graft Registry: 1990 to 1992 report. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1993;21(suppl):1-48. 25. Schimmelpfennig BH. Tissue storage and tissue typing: short term--state of the art. In: Brightbill FS, ed. Corneal Surgery: Theory, Technique, and Tissue. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1993:597-609. 26. Lass JH, Bourne WM, Musch DC, et al. A randomized, prospective, double-masked clinical trial of Optisol vs DexSol corneal storage media. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1404-1408. 27. Lindstrom RL, Kaufman HE, Skelnik DL, et al. Optisol corneal storage medium. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;114:345-356. 28. Wong SK, Gottsch JD, Green WR, Chen CH, Stark WJ. Corneal graft survival in the cat with prolonged preservation in McCarey-Kaufman and K-Sol media. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:981-985. 29. Binder PS. Eye banking and corneal preservation. In: Symposium on Medical and Surgical Diseases of the Cornea. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1980:320-354. 30. Forster RK, Fine M. Relation of donor age to success in penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;85:42-47. 31. Jenkins MS, Lempert SL, Brown SI. Significance of donor age in penetrating keratoplasty. Ann Ophthalmol. 1979;11:974-976. 32. Abbott RL, Forster RK. Determinants of graft clarity in penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1071-1075. 33. Barraquer RI, Kargacin M. Prognostic factors in penetrating keratoplasty. Dev Ophthalmol.1989;18:165-171.},
	keywords = {Clinical Medicine., Corneal Transplantation, Eye Banks.},
	issn = {0003-9950},
	author = {Wilhelmus,Kirk R. and Stulting,R. and Doyle Sugar, Joel Khan,Myrna M. and for the Medical Advisory Board of the Eye Bank Association of America}
}
